From ABC News · ABC News · · 3m
Trump bans three outlets, faces First Amendment lawsuit
CNN, MS NOW and Politico sue to restore White House access after Trump revokes their credentials, citing retaliation for coverage he deems unfavorable.
In brief
CNN, MS NOW and Politico sue to restore White House access after Trump revokes their credentials, citing retaliation for coverage he deems unfavorable. Three major news outlets sued President Trump on Monday after he banned them from the White House, claiming he violated their First Amendment rights by revoking…
Trump bans three news outlets
President Donald Trump announced Friday he was banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, citing their reporting.
Reporters turned away over weekend

Journalists from the three outlets were denied entry to the White House starting Saturday. A CNN reporter said a Secret Service agent told her badge had been deactivated.
Three outlets file lawsuit Monday
CNN, MS NOW and Politico filed a First Amendment lawsuit seeking a temporary restraining order to restore their reporters' credentials.
Outlets call it direct assault
The three outlets said the ban aims to protect First Amendment rights and defend the principle that government does not decide what the press reports.
“Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists' credentials because it objected to our reporting.”
Trump says it's not press assault

Trump said the ban was not an assault on the free press but on fake news, which he called a national security threat.
“It's an assault on the FAKE NEWS, which he claimed was a national security threat.”
Trump defends his position
At an Oval Office event, Trump said outlets write purposely negative content and he supports a fair and honest press, not a sick one.
“It's sick. I mean, there's something wrong with a country that can allow people to write purposely negative stuff.”
Trump hints at expanding ban
Trump suggested there may be more restrictions on other outlets, warning of a cascading effect for news organizations.
Lawsuit cites multiple violations

The outlets challenge the ban on three grounds: it violates due process rights, unlawfully retaliates against protected speech, and violates the First Amendment.
“This ban could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles.”
TV pool stations support outlets
ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, Fox News Media and CNN issued a statement saying no administration should restrict outlets because it objects to their reporting.
“The public has a vital interest in receiving accurate, independent information about its government.”
Vance reframes as access denial
Vice President JD Vance said Trump is not banning outlets but refusing special access to those spreading propaganda against the president.
“He's not banning media outlets. What he's doing is saying we're not going to give you special access to the White House if you engage in what is effectively propaganda.”
Judge Kelly assigned to case

D.C. District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee, has been assigned the case. He previously ruled in favor of CNN's Jim Acosta in a similar two thousand eighteen dispute.
Trump predicts Kelly will rule against him
Trump posted on social media that Kelly would rule against him and an appeal was forthcoming, calling outlets that write false stories a national security threat.
“Those who violate our National Security by writing false and defamatory stories with unknown sources, shouldn't be allowed access to the most important Office anywhere in the World.”
Hearing set for Wednesday
Judge Kelly has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday afternoon. The Trump administration must file its response by Tuesday.
Precedent remains unsettled

The full D.C. Circuit and Supreme Court have not established settled precedent since Trump's earlier attempted ban on the Associated Press last year.
What matters most
Three major news outlets sued President Trump on Monday after he banned them from the White House, claiming he violated their First Amendment rights by revoking credentials without due process.


