From Ars Technica · · 1m 50s
Apple under fire for removing ICE-tracking apps
Lawmakers accuse Apple of censoring immigration enforcement watchdogs after pressure from Trump administration officials.
In brief
Lawmakers accuse Apple of censoring immigration enforcement watchdogs after pressure from Trump administration officials. US Rep. Jamie Raskin says Apple removed ICE-tracking apps without evidence they posed safety risks, violating users' First Amendment rights to record government activity. Originally reported by Ars…
Apple removes ICE-tracking apps
Apple removed apps like ICEBlock from its App Store, apparently after Trump administration pressure citing officer safety concerns.
Raskin: no evidence of danger
US Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland says Apple has no evidence the apps raised safety concerns and is violating First Amendment rights.
“working with the government to violate its customers' First Amendment rights to record and report on the activities of their own government”
Dallas shooting triggered removals

Apple told Raskin in July that ICEBlock was removed after a fatal shooting at a Dallas ICE office left two detainees dead.
Shooter had no connection to app
Shooter Joshua Jahn fired indiscriminately into the ICE facility. Raskin says there is no evidence Jahn used ICE-tracking apps.
DHS claims unverified threat spike
The Department of Homeland Security claims ICE officers face an eight thousand percent increase in death threats but will not release data to verify it.
Raskin disputes shooter's app use

FBI Director Kash Patel said the shooter searched for ICE-tracking apps. Raskin counters he found the address using Apple's standard maps app.
“he did not need a tracking app to locate the fixed position of a government building”
Officials bragged about removal
ICEBlock creator Joshua Aaron says Trump officials publicly bragged about getting the app removed. Apple's letter seemed to confirm government influence.
Trump admin denies pressure
The Trump administration asked the court to dismiss Aaron's lawsuit, claiming Apple independently chose to remove the apps despite officials taking credit.
“I made the demand and Apple did so”
Court may reveal hidden talks

Aaron argues the case should proceed to discovery, which would reveal actual communications between government officials and Apple leadership.
First Amendment right at stake
Raskin told Apple that monitoring federal immigration authorities is a core First Amendment right and the removals will not survive legal scrutiny.
“Monitoring the actions of federal immigration authorities who have been deployed to users' neighborhoods is a core First Amendment right and not a crime”
The key point
US Rep. Jamie Raskin says Apple removed ICE-tracking apps without evidence they posed safety risks, violating users' First Amendment rights to record government activity.



