US Court Orders Meta to Identify Data Decisions in AI Copyright Case

US court forces Meta to name all who approved pirated book data for AI training.

By ·

Oct 21, 2026

7 cards · 1m · tap to begin

From · · · 1m

US Court Orders Meta to Identify Data Decisions in AI Copyright Case

US court forces Meta to name all who approved pirated book data for AI training.

In brief

US court forces Meta to name all who approved pirated book data for AI training. US court orders Meta to identify individuals who approved obtaining pirated books from shadow libraries for AI training. Originally reported by BigGo Finance.

Court order

US Court Orders Meta to Identify Everyone Who "Approved" Obtaining Pirated Books in AI Training Copyright Suit

US Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson ordered Meta to identify all who approved obtaining pirated books from shadow libraries and BitTorrent.

Data volumes

Plaintiffs allege Meta obtained 80.6 terabytes from LibGen and 35.7 terabytes from Anna's Archive.

Meta's defense

Meta claimed its early AI data buildout was informal with no authorized decision-makers.

Court rejection

Court rejection

Hixson rejected Meta's argument that decisions were made only technically by employees.

Decision-making requirement

Even team decisions require naming all individuals involved in approving data sources.

Internal messages

Plaintiffs cite internal messages showing decisions escalated to Mark Zuckerberg.

Unused data

Court seeks explanation for handling works downloaded but never used in model training.

At a glance

US court orders Meta to identify individuals who approved obtaining pirated books from shadow libraries for AI training.

Read the original on BigGo Finance

React

Sign in to react and comment.

Comments (0)

Life is short. Keep it sweet. Respect others' opinions and be kind!

    Recommended next

    More decks on us court and related topics.