From California Post · · 1m 40s
Kamala Harris should cash out and leave politics behind
The former VP lost twice and has no real vision, yet she's still talking about running again in 2028.
In brief
The former VP lost twice and has no real vision, yet she's still talking about running again in 2028. Harris has no realistic path to the Democratic nomination after losing twice, and her continued presence is blocking the party from finding fresh candidates. Originally reported by California Post.
Harris won't go away
She lost two presidential races but keeps talking about running again in 2028. Most failed politicians find corporate boards or lecture circuits.
She has no core beliefs
On Israel, she boycotted AIPAC in 2019, then met them privately, and now courts anti-Israel progressives. She's just trying to stay relevant.
The party won't nominate her
No party nominates someone who lost twice. Donors won't write checks and volunteers won't show up for a proven loser.
“There is no chance that the party is going to nominate a candidate who has lost twice.”
She lost the popular vote
In 2024, Harris lost the popular vote to Trump. Not even Hillary Clinton did that, despite having cash, media support, and starting on third base.
“Kamala blames the fact that she had only "107 days" to campaign. But she had four years in office before that.”
Her 2020 campaign flopped early
Harris dropped out before the first primary vote was cast. Voters who came to hear her often left deflated by her performances.
She's never been great
Willie Brown gave her a head start in California politics. She did nothing as Attorney General or in the Senate, and her campaigns were just anti-Trump.
She's blocking better candidates
Harris is keeping donors and activists captive instead of letting them find more interesting candidates. Even Gavin Newsom says he's waiting to see what she does.
Democrats need a Bill Clinton
The party faces an ideological struggle between socialists and establishment. They need someone who can unify them with a fresh vision, like Clinton did after Reagan.
The main idea
Harris has no realistic path to the Democratic nomination after losing twice, and her continued presence is blocking the party from finding fresh candidates.
