From Dallas Express · Dallas Express · · 1m 40s
Padilla Stout's parental-rights appeal
A congressional candidate's court work is drawing attention after an abuse-linked parental-rights case.
In brief
A congressional candidate's court work is drawing attention after an abuse-linked parental-rights case. The appeal did not change the outcome: courts left the father's parental-rights termination in place. Originally reported by Dallas Express.
Candidate case surfaces

Katy Padilla Stout, the Democratic nominee in Texas' 23rd District, represented a father appealing the termination of his parental rights.
Campaign biography cited
Her campaign presents her as a lifelong Texan, mother, attorney, former teacher, and advocate for children and families in the district.
“My life has been defined by a firm commitment to serving the children, families, and communities”
Court role identified
Court records list Padilla Stout as attorney for J.A., father of two children. The docket does not say whether she was appointed or privately retained.
CPS complaint began case
The case began after a 2022 complaint that a child was crying, two slaps were heard, and the father was the only other person in the room.
Abuse concerns detailed
State officials alleged the father slapped the child hard enough to cause bruising, swelling, and redness near the eye, requiring EMS evaluation.
Alcohol concerns grew
The service plan cited worries that the father drank excessively while caring for the children, putting them at risk of injury or death.
“putting them in imminent danger of injury or death”
Jail time weighed heavily
The appellate opinion said the father was incarcerated for nine of the 13 months in the termination case. A sexual assault charge sent him back to jail before trial.
Termination was affirmed
After an April 2025 bench trial, the court terminated his parental rights. The Fourth Court of Appeals rejected the appeal in a 2-1 decision.
“the evidence is legally sufficient to support this finding”
Dissent saw gaps
Justice Lori Massey Brissette dissented, saying key claims lacked support and the case deserved another look on conservatorship. The Texas Supreme Court denied review.
The essence
The appeal did not change the outcome: courts left the father's parental-rights termination in place.


