The photographer critics loved to hate

William Eggleston got savaged in 1976 for shooting tricycles and lightbulbs in color. A new London show shows who was actually wrong.

8 cards · 1m 40s · tap to begin

From · · 1m 40s

The photographer critics loved to hate

William Eggleston got savaged in 1976 for shooting tricycles and lightbulbs in color. A new London show shows who was actually wrong.

In brief

William Eggleston got savaged in 1976 for shooting tricycles and lightbulbs in color. A new London show shows who was actually wrong. The pictures never changed. The taste of the people looking at them did. Originally reported by Digital Camera World.

Godfather of color

Godfather of color

William Eggleston, now 87, is credited with making color photography a serious art form. A new London retrospective is a reminder that nobody handed him that title.

“Godfather of Color Photography”

Sixty years, one gallery

A colour photograph of a woman in profile wearing a brown skirt suit with a printed blouse, standing outside a brick building.

All That Goes Unnoticed runs at The Photographers' Gallery from October to February, covering six decades of work and gathering the images most people already half-remember.

The famous ordinary things

A color photograph of a weathered green child's tricycle parked on a driveway in front of a suburban house.

A rusted child's tricycle. A bulb hanging from a blood-red ceiling. A supermarket worker draped over a train of trolleys. Each got the same level attention.

Advertising's expensive process

A color photograph of a bare lightbulb hanging on a cord from a deep red ceiling, with wires stretching across the room.

He printed in dye-transfer, a costly, painstaking method studios saved for whisky ads and car brochures. Anything that had to look irresistible.

“at war with the obvious”

Glamour aimed at nothing

A color photograph of a young man leaning over a row of stacked shopping trolleys outside a store, with a woman walking behind him.

Pointing that precision at driveways and shop fronts was revolutionary in the 1970s. It also read, to many people, as a joke or an insult.

Brutal at MoMA, 1976

A color photograph taken from behind a woman with grey hair swept into an updo, sitting in a diner booth as a man across the table smokes a cigarette.

When the work first showed at MoMA, New York Times critic Hilton Kramer called it perfectly banal and perfectly boring, and dismissed the people in it as dismal figures.

“Perfect? Perfectly banal, perhaps. Perfectly boring, certainly.”

Most hated show of the year

A color photograph of two men playing pinball machines inside an arcade lined with rows of lit-up games.

Another Times writer, Gene Thornton, reportedly voted it the year's worst. Color was still seen as a commercial medium, and only monochrome counted as art.

“dismal figures inhabiting a commonplace world of little visual interest”

He took the bad reviews

A man wearing a bright orange sweater and cap walks down a cobblestone sidewalk carrying a red box past a row of vibrant, colorful storefronts.

Half a century of photographers have since applied serious color to unserious subjects and been praised for it. Eggleston went first and absorbed the damage.

“It's the eye looking at them that needed time to catch up.”

The bottom line

The pictures never changed. The taste of the people looking at them did.

Read the original on Digital Camera World

React

Sign in to react and comment.

Comments (0)

Life is short. Keep it sweet. Respect others' opinions and be kind!

    Recommended next

    More decks on photography and related topics.