From Financialexpress · FE Bureau · · 3m
Startups vs innovation
India's startup surge may not equal tech sovereignty.
In brief
India's startup surge may not equal tech sovereignty. India's startup boom requires deeper innovation and R&D investment to achieve technological sovereignty, not just capital growth. Originally reported by Financialexpress.
Startup surge
India is approaching a historically consequential inflection point by 2047 where talent, capital, digital infrastructure, industrial capability, state capacity and geopolitical relevance combine to make the country a major global centre of innovation.
Book authors
Rajan Anandan and Saurabh Srivastava co-authored The Lift-Off Nation, a 384-page book priced at Rs1,099 published by Juggernaut.
Third wave

The authors frame India's present startup surge as the third great wave of modern entrepreneurship, following IT services and mobile telecommunications.
Ecosystem storytelling
The book shows how entrepreneurship emerges from the confluence of talent, capital, regulation, public infrastructure, large companies, universities and cultural permission to take risks.
Path dependence
The IT industry created technical skills, managerial systems, global customer familiarity, employee stock-option precedents and founder role models that later migrated into startups.
Investment continuum
India received about `14 lakh crore in venture investment between 2012-25, with over 40% coming during the atypical exuberant 2021-22 period.
Global ambition
The book emphasizes that global success requires regulatory sophistication, category insight, product reliability and the ability to build trust in markets where 'Made in India' is not yet universally a premium signal.
R&D deficit
India's R&D expenditure is reported at 0.65% of GDP, compared with 2.6% for China and 6.4% for Israel, requiring a move toward at least 3% of GDP.
Biocon critique
Biocon's Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw warns that 'We are all in our zone of comfort, mimicking what others have already done' and risks losing intellectual property and scientific careers.
“We are all in our zone of comfort, mimicking what others have already done”
VC implications
For VCs, India's capital ecosystem cannot claim maturity if it rewards quick scaling more reliably than scientific depth and risk.
AI risks
The book understates the risk that global foundation-model providers, cloud platforms and semiconductor firms will capture disproportionate value even as Indian startups excel in applications.
Distributional gaps
The book pays less attention to who captures the upside, with founders and investors disproportionately drawn from already privileged networks.
Policy gaps
The authors correctly identify regulatory clarity, approval speed and corporate governance as 'speed bumps' but governance deserves a more central role.
“speed bumps”
The window
The window is open now but will stay open only if Indian founders build globally credible companies, VCs fund technological risk alongside growth, and policymakers create research, regulatory and institutional foundations.
The bottom line
India's startup boom requires deeper innovation and R&D investment to achieve technological sovereignty, not just capital growth.




