Stanford study warns California billionaire tax could backfire

Economists say the proposed wealth tax would raise far less than promised and cost the state billions in lost income taxes.

10 cards · 3m · tap to begin

From · · · 3m

Stanford study warns California billionaire tax could backfire

Economists say the proposed wealth tax would raise far less than promised and cost the state billions in lost income taxes.

In brief

Economists say the proposed wealth tax would raise far less than promised and cost the state billions in lost income taxes. Stanford economists warn California's proposed billionaire tax could generate only thirty billion dollars instead of one hundred billion, and trigger departures costing the state thirty nine…

California's billionaire tax promise

Supporters of Proposition 40 say it would raise one hundred billion dollars, with ninety percent of proceeds earmarked for health care. The measure is on California's November third ballot.

How the tax would work

Proposition 40 would impose a one-time five percent tax on the net worth of California's few hundred billionaires who were residents on January first, twenty twenty six.The tax would be due in twenty twenty seven.

Stanford economists see much less

Stanford economists see much less

Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh from Stanford University's Hoover Institution estimate the tax would collect about thirty billion dollars, in a range of twenty eight billion to thirty six billion dollars.

Billionaires are already leaving

The researchers estimate billionaire departures have already eliminated nearly thirty percent of the proposed tax base. Seven billionaires who publicly moved out account for roughly five hundred forty billion dollars in wealth.

Who has left California

Peter Thiel and Google cofounders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are among the seven billionaires who have publicly moved out of California, according to the study cited by CBS News.

The long-term cost to California

Stanford economists estimate billionaire departures could cost California one billion to three point five billion dollars a year in lost income tax revenue.

Other economists disagree

Economists Jasper Boll, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman argue that even if every billionaire permanently left, it would take roughly twenty five years for accumulated income tax losses to match the proposed one hundred billion…

A three hundred forty million fight

Tech billionaires have raised more than three hundred forty million dollars to oppose Proposition 40.Sergey Brin is the largest donor with more than one hundred million dollars.

Governor Newsom opposes the tax

California Governor Gavin Newsom opposes Proposition 40, arguing it could drive wealthy residents and their income tax payments out of the state. He endorsed Proposition 42, a competing measure that would block Proposition 40.

Voters will decide November third

A recent Citrin Center and Politico poll found forty six percent of likely voters in favor of Proposition 40 and forty three percent opposed.Competing measures could nullify the tax if they receive more yes votes.

The short version

Stanford economists warn California's proposed billionaire tax could generate only thirty billion dollars instead of one hundred billion, and trigger departures costing the state thirty nine billion dollars in lost income tax revenue.

Read the original on Fortune

React

Sign in to react and comment.

Comments (0)

Life is short. Keep it sweet. Respect others' opinions and be kind!

    Recommended next

    More decks on california and related topics.