From New York Post · · 50s
Zuckerberg and Huang dismiss AI safety warnings
Meta and Nvidia leaders reject government AI regulation calls, insisting companies must handle safety themselves.
In brief
Meta and Nvidia leaders reject government AI regulation calls, insisting companies must handle safety themselves. Tech giants argue AI safety and speed can coexist without government intervention. Originally reported by New York Post.
Zuckerberg on AI safety
Zuckerberg says AI labs naturally prioritize safety because users won’t trust misaligned models and companies face liability for harm.
“Every lab has the responsibility and incentive to move at the pace required to train its models safely”
Huang on speed and safety
Huang argues companies can achieve both speed and safety by taking pauses when products become unsafe.
“Run as fast as you can but if you feel at any given point in time the company’s out of control or the product’s not going to be safe take a pause and make sure you get it right”
Amodei’s warning
Anthropic’s Amodei urges slowing AI development to prevent risks from overly powerful models.
“I think that’s going to be very difficult because the incentives to pull ahead and the military advantage that you get from that are so large”
Trump’s dismissal
Trump calls AI safety warnings a conspiracy to help China gain an edge in the global AI race.
“He specifically took aim at Amodei for pretending to be a perfect little angel”
China’s stance
China labels AI safety warnings as fear mongering and plans to lead AI collaboration in developing nations.
“Guo Jiakun a spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry chalked the warnings up to fear mongering”
In short
Tech giants argue AI safety and speed can coexist without government intervention.
