From Slate Magazine · · 1m 10s
Supreme Court faces mail voting and environmental cases
Election law and environmental experts break down what's next for voting access and conservation at SCOTUS.
In brief
Election law and environmental experts break down what's next for voting access and conservation at SCOTUS. Vote in person if you can, and the Supreme Court's skepticism toward environmental protection doesn't guarantee defeat for conservation advocates. Originally reported by Slate Magazine.
Mail voting goes to court again
Trump's executive order on mail-in voting has reached the Supreme Court three times. Election law expert Richard Hasen discusses what the latest ruling means for midterm voters.
Voters should cast ballots in person
With mail voting in flux, election law expert Richard Hasen's advice to listeners is straightforward: vote in person if you can to avoid uncertainty.
“get out there and vote in-person”
SCOTUS skeptical on environment
The Supreme Court has a longstanding pattern of skepticism toward environmental protection. But Sam Sankar of Earthjustice says this doesn't necessarily doom conservation cases.
Air Force bombing case heads to court
One upcoming environmental case involves whether the Air Force can continue explosives testing over a historic beach in Guam. The case kicks off the Supreme Court term in weeks.
Environmental advocates stay optimistic
Despite the Court's track record, Sam Sankar says the Supreme Court's skepticism toward the environment doesn't make him as pessimistic as one might expect.
The headline
Vote in person if you can, and the Supreme Court's skepticism toward environmental protection doesn't guarantee defeat for conservation advocates.
