From The Banner · Olivia Bensimon · · 3m
An AI ram won the Maryland State Fair photo prize
A Nano Banana ram took first place in a fair photo contest, and local photographers are not laughing.
In brief
A Nano Banana ram took first place in a fair photo contest, and local photographers are not laughing. The rules never said what "embellished" meant, so an AI edit won before anyone had decided whether it should count. Originally reported by The Banner.
A cybernetic ram takes first
Guy Alston photographed a ram at a Maryland agricultural fair a couple of years ago, then reworked it with Google Gemini's Nano Banana into something robotic and electric. It won first place.
The category invited it
The win came in "Neon Lights," one of two rotating special categories at the fair's photo contest. It allowed pictures to be "embellished." The rules never defined the word.
Reddit found it fast
Users on the r/Maryland subreddit went after the fair for letting the image compete at all. The contest runs through Sunday, and officials now call the whole thing a wake-up call.
Eleven dollars
Alston thinks the outrage is out of scale with the stakes. General photo entries pay $7 for first down to $4 for fourth. "Neon Lights" paid $11.
“Reactions to things should be in an order of magnitude to the thing.”
The organizer did not know
Sam Chamelin, who administers the contest, only knew the picture had been "embellished" from a real photo. He learned about Nano Banana after the judging was done.
It snuck up on them
Chamelin admits the entry leaned closer to digital art than photography, but says it met this year's guidelines and he stands by the judges. New AI rules are coming.
“One day we're gonna have to deal with AI. It snuck up on us faster than we thought.”
Photography as coping
Alston, 61, of Randallstown, picked up a camera about eight years ago after his wife died. It stayed a casual hobby that carried him through hard years.
“I love photography. It's gotten me through some very rough times.”
The darkroom defense
Alston says photographers have always pushed images, first in the darkroom, then in Photoshop. To him AI is the same instinct with a newer tool, and the picture resonated with a judge.
Obvious to everyone online
Will Varner, 30, saw it in a group chat and laughed, then felt deflated. Anyone who has spent time online this year, he says, can spot it instantly.
“We all know that this is absurd, but we all are also very sad because this is being recognized as something that it's not.”
Where photography ends
Sami Hunter, a Baltimore photographer and singer, draws the line at intent. Strip the original spirit out of a photo through a model and you have a generated image instead.
Why bother entering
Rob Glass skipped this year over printing and mounting costs against tiny prizes. His point: the low stakes are exactly why an AI win guts the contest's reason to exist.
“If there's a chance that some AI is going to win, why am I going to enter this?”
The bottom line
The rules never said what "embellished" meant, so an AI edit won before anyone had decided whether it should count.





