# Grok's $100k AI Odyssey has a 3-eyed Cyclops problem

> Elon Musk's AI image generator awarded a filmmaker $100k for an 'accurate' ancient epic, but the results are hilariously broken.
- Title: Grok's $100k AI Odyssey has a 3-eyed Cyclops problem
- Summary: Elon Musk's AI image generator awarded a filmmaker $100k for an 'accurate' ancient epic, but the results are hilariously broken. AI-generated content can win…
- Keywords: grok, elon musk, ai image generation, the odyssey, contest, ai-generated content, filmmaker, 100k award, accuracy, physics fails, technology, Grok's
- Source: TechRadar — https://techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/elon-musks-grok-ai-contest-awards-usd100k-to-historically-accurate-version-of-the-odyssey-but-it-features-a-3-eyed-cyclops-and-hilarious-physics-fails
- Published: 2026-09-17T13:11:32+00:00
- Read time: 1 min
- Topics: grok, elon musk, ai image generation, the odyssey, contest, ai-generated content, filmmaker, 100k award, accuracy, physics fails, technology
## Grok awards $100k for AI Odyssey film
Elon Musk's Grok AI image generator gave a $100,000 prize to a filmmaker for creating an AI-generated version of Homer's The Odyssey.
## The film claims historical accuracy
The winning entry was marketed as 'historically accurate,' positioning it as a faithful adaptation of the ancient Greek epic.
## But it has a 3-eyed Cyclops
The film features a Cyclops with three eyes instead of one, undermining its accuracy claims and revealing AI's struggle with basic details.
## Physics fails throughout the film
Beyond the Cyclops error, the video contains numerous physics failures and visual glitches that critics found laughable.
## Critics compare it to wet cardboard
Reviewers harshly criticized the final product, with one likening the experience to 'eating a bowl of wet cardboard.'

> 'eating a bowl of wet cardboard'
## Questions about AI competition standards
The award raises concerns about whether AI contests have adequate quality control and whether prizes should go to visibly flawed work.
## Key takeaway

AI-generated content can win major prizes despite obvious flaws, raising questions about quality standards in AI competitions.