# Senate candidates push to raise Social Security taxes

> Democrats across battleground states are campaigning on lifting the payroll tax cap to prevent automatic benefit cuts in 2032.
- Title: Senate candidates push to raise Social Security taxes
- Summary: Democrats across battleground states are campaigning on lifting the payroll tax cap to prevent automatic benefit cuts in 2032. Senate candidates, mostly…
- Keywords: social security, senate candidates, payroll tax, 2032 deadline, democrats, michigan, iowa, texas, abdul el-sayed, josh turek, james talarico, politics
- Source: NBC News — https://nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/looming-social-security-debate-politics-desk-rcna602393
- Author: The Politics Desk
- Published: 2026-10-08T21:35:43.41+00:00
- Read time: 2 min
- Topics: social security, senate candidates, payroll tax, 2032 deadline, democrats, michigan, iowa, texas, abdul el-sayed, josh turek, james talarico, politics
## The Social Security deadline
Social Security is fully funded until the fourth quarter of twenty thirty-two, after which benefits will automatically be cut by twenty-two percent unless Congress acts.
## Senate terms align with crisis
The class of senators elected this fall will serve six-year terms ending January twenty thirty-three, giving them power to address the twenty thirty-two deadline.
## Current tax cap explained
Americans are currently taxed on earnings up to one hundred eighty-four thousand five hundred dollars to fund Social Security.
## Michigan Democrat's position
Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed said if elected, he will end the cap on Social Security tax to make sure the rich pay their fair share.

> I will end the cap on Social Security tax to make sure the rich pay their fair share.
## Iowa Democrat's approach
Democrat Josh Turek supports eliminating the payroll tax cap and will protect Social Security by lifting the cap to make billionaires pay their fair share.
## Texas Democrat's proposal
Democrat James Talarico is running on a platform to ensure the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share by eliminating the tax cap on those earning over four hundred thousand dollars a year.
## Disagreement on cap level
Supporters of raising Social Security taxes disagree on whether to eliminate the cap entirely or move the new tax threshold to four hundred thousand dollars.
## Democrats' PAC dilemma
Refusing corporate PAC contributions has become an article of faith among progressives, but the pledge faces complications from super PAC spending.
## Direct PAC limits
Corporate PACs can only give five thousand dollars per election directly to a candidate, hardly enough to influence races that turn on tens of millions of dollars.
## Schumer's super PAC haul
Senate Majority PAC, backed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, had raised one hundred fifty million dollars through the end of June, much from billionaires and corporations.
## Hinson's debate challenge
Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa, told Josh Turek he is taking laundered corporate PAC money that flows through Chuck Schumer to support him.

> He is basically taking laundered corporate PAC money.
## Turek's non-response
Turek ignored Hinson's invitation to call on corporate-funded outside groups to stop backing him in the Iowa Senate race.
## Super PAC coordination limits
Super PACs cannot coordinate directly with campaigns but are designed to amplify candidates' messages, creating a grey area for Democratic candidates.
## The Schumer paradox
Democratic candidates distance themselves from Schumer while benefiting from his fundraising, but a secret ballot leadership election next year may reveal their true preferences.
## Key takeaway

Senate candidates, mostly Democrats, are running on raising Social Security taxes on higher earners to avert a twenty-two percent benefit cut scheduled for twenty thirty-two.