# Supreme Court greenlights flawed voter database

> The Trump administration can now use a citizenship verification system with a documented history of wrongly flagging eligible voters as noncitizens.
- Title: Supreme Court greenlights flawed voter database · Mother Jones
- Summary: The Trump administration can now use a citizenship verification system with a documented history of wrongly flagging eligible voters as noncitizens. The SAVE…
- Keywords: supreme court, trump administration, voter registration, citizenship verification, save database, department of homeland security, voter fraud, election integrity, naturalized citizens, voter disenfranchisement, 2026 midterms, Supreme
- Source: Mother Jones — https://motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/supreme-court-save-database
- Author: Ari Berman
- Published: 2026-09-25T13:01:58+00:00
- Read time: 2 min
- Topics: supreme court, trump administration, voter registration, citizenship verification, save database, department of homeland security, voter fraud, election integrity, naturalized citizens, voter disenfranchisement, 2026 midterms
## Supreme Court clears controversial database
The Supreme Court's conservative majority overturned a lower court order blocking the Trump administration from using the SAVE database to check voter eligibility, despite documented errors.
## Justice Jackson's dissent warns of harm
The three Democratic appointees argued that wrongly disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs any benefit from preventing fraud the government likely lacks authority to address.

> The harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs the nonexistent harm that the Government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take.
## SAVE database has long history of errors
Created in 1986 to verify citizenship for benefit applicants, the SAVE database was dramatically expanded by Trump in March 2025 to check voter eligibility, increasing false positive rates.
## Expansion added risky new features
The revamped database now includes native-born American data, full Social Security numbers, and bulk search capabilities that dramatically increase the chance eligible voters get wrongly flagged as noncitizens.
## Naturalized citizens most at risk
Naturalized citizens, newly married people with name changes, and those with mismatched documents are most likely to be wrongly tagged as noncitizens and have registrations canceled.
## Missouri found 81 percent error rate
When Missouri ran its voter list through SAVE in November 2025, the database flagged 691 voters as noncitizens, but 35 percent were actually naturalized citizens and 81 percent of results were ultimately wrong.
## Missouri election officials sound alarm
Seventy county clerks from both parties warned state leaders that SAVE repeatedly flags people they know are US citizens, including voters they personally registered at naturalization ceremonies.
## Texas also seeing widespread errors
In Denton County, SAVE identified 84 supposed noncitizens, but twelve proved citizenship, fourteen were mistakenly registered despite marking they weren't citizens, and officials believe most others are eligible voters.

> What is bugging me is I think our voter rolls may be more accurate than this database.
## DHS made wildly false fraud claims
After claiming 15,903 noncitizens were registered in Nevada, DHS later admitted the number was actually 185, and Nevada officials confirmed it was zero.
## Whistleblower alleges illegal tactics
A DHS whistleblower disclosed that immigration agents falsely posed as voters to access state databases and wrongly swept up US citizens in overzealous investigations to find noncitizen voters.
## Noncitizen voting is extremely rare
Studies show noncitizen voting is incredibly rare, yet the Trump administration has enlisted hundreds of agents to search for it as part of its Unlawful Voter Initiative ahead of midterms.
## Limited impact on 2026 elections
The National Voter Registration Act prevents states from removing voters ninety days before elections, so SAVE's impact on the 2026 midterms will likely be minimal.
## Database fuels false fraud narratives
Even with limited election impact, the Supreme Court's decision lets the administration use SAVE to generate outrageous voter fraud claims to challenge midterm results.
## Key takeaway

The SAVE database has repeatedly misidentified naturalized citizens and other eligible voters as noncitizens, but the Supreme Court cleared its use anyway.