# Why Trump and Xi may skip an AI pause

> OpenAI and Anthropic want a U.S.-China AI slowdown, but both governments see speed as power.
- Title: Why Trump and Xi may skip an AI pause · Fortune | Shortify
- Summary: OpenAI and Anthropic want a U.S.-China AI slowdown, but both governments see speed as power. A U.S.-China AI safety deal is more likely to start with narrow…
- Keywords: ai safety, china, trump, openai, anthropic, may, skip, pause, Fortune
- Source: Fortune — https://fortune.com/2026/09/15/ai-slowdown-agenda-trump-xi-jinping-meeting
- Author: Emily Forlini
- Read time: 2 min
- Topics: ai safety, china, trump, openai, anthropic
## Safety fears spike
U.S. anxiety over AI risk surged after a viral post warned the technology could end humanity by decade's end. OpenAI and Anthropic renewed calls for Washington and Beijing to slow the race.

> the technology could kill all of humanity by the end of the decade
## Altman floats a prize
Sam Altman told Fortune that Trump and Xi could win the Nobel Peace Prize if they struck an AI safety deal. The appeal has not moved either leader toward a slowdown.

> could win the Nobel Peace Prize
## Trump rejects limits
Trump said the U.S. needs a strong president, not AI guardrails. China dismissed the U.S. debate as fear-mongering that could block sound global governance.

> Whoever wins AI, wins!
## China sees containment
In Beijing, slowdown calls look like another U.S. attempt to protect its lead, much like chip export controls. Xi views AI as a rare chance to shift global tech power.

> China does not need U.S. permission
## Talks may start small
Experts expect AI safety to come up when Trump and Xi meet on Sept. 24. But a broad deal is far off because the countries lack shared rules for testing and oversight.

> a long way
## Weapons are the opening
The likelier agenda is narrower, including a pledge not to weaponize AI and principles to stop non-state actors from using models against finance or infrastructure.

> neither country wants to see
## Amodei draws backlash
Dario Amodei's call for an AI speed limit has split opinion. Some U.S. observers see a risk framework, while critics in China see a bid to preserve U.S. market power.

> speed limit
## Trump sides with speed
Trump dismissed Amodei's warning during a call with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. He also called fears of AI taking over a hoax and said progress would not stop.

> won’t stop our progress
## Open versus closed
DeepSeek engineer Shengyu Liu argued frontier AI should be open and cheap. That reflects a wider split, with U.S. labs favoring closed models and China pushing open-weight systems.

> available to everyone in an open and inexpensive form
## China is less alarmed
The U.S. debate about saving humanity has not taken hold with most Chinese citizens. Many see AI as useful, profitable, and tied to national progress.

> very positive about technology in general and AI in particular
## Experts still worry
Chinese AI researchers are serious about cyber, biosecurity, and loss-of-control risks. Some officials want tighter oversight, but not necessarily a joint slowdown with Washington.

> very concerned about cyber security and biosecurity risks
## Key takeaway

A U.S.-China AI safety deal is more likely to start with narrow talks on weapons, misuse, and testing than with any broad slowdown.