Federal Judge Rules Warrantless Flock Search Violated Fourth Amendment

Federal judge orders prosecutors to exclude evidence from warrantless vehicle searches using Flock Safety license plate readers.

8 cards · 1m 40s · tap to begin

From · · · 1m 40s

Federal Judge Rules Warrantless Flock Search Violated Fourth Amendment

Federal judge orders prosecutors to exclude evidence from warrantless vehicle searches using Flock Safety license plate readers.

In brief

Federal judge orders prosecutors to exclude evidence from warrantless vehicle searches using Flock Safety license plate readers. A federal judge ruled that a deputy's warrantless search of historical vehicle location records via Flock Safety violated the Fourth Amendment, requiring prosecutors to exclude the evidence…

Federal judge rules warrantless flock search violated fourth amendment

U.S. District Judge Sara E. Hill ruled that a deputy violated the Fourth Amendment by searching historical vehicle-location records without a warrant through license plate reader systems including Flock Safety.

“This is a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance”

Deputy searched vehicle records without warrant

Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff Freddie Alaniz queried Flock and VehicleManager systems for a month of vehicle records across multiple states without a warrant.

Kyle claimed vehicle was rental

Kyle claimed vehicle was rental

Kyle told Alaniz the Mazda SUV was a rental, but the records tracked the vehicle rather than independently establishing who drove it at every sighting.

Judge found no reasonable suspicion

Hill upheld the initial traffic stop but found the deputy lacked reasonable suspicion to prolong it for a drug investigation.

Government argued no privacy expectation

The government claimed drivers have no reasonable expectation of privacy in license plates and movements visible on public roads.

Judge distinguished individual vs. broad search

Hill distinguished individual observations from a broad database search of historical movements, concluding the search intruded on Kyle's reasonable expectation of privacy.

Flock expects appeal

Flock Safety spokesman Paris Lewbel stated the company expects an appeal and reversal of the ruling.

Different precedent applies in Texas

The Fifth Circuit ruled in March that license plate reader use in Texas did not constitute a Fourth Amendment search requiring a warrant.

The main idea

A federal judge ruled that a deputy's warrantless search of historical vehicle location records via Flock Safety violated the Fourth Amendment, requiring prosecutors to exclude the evidence.

Read the original on Dallas Express

React

Sign in to react and comment.

Comments (0)

Life is short. Keep it sweet. Respect others' opinions and be kind!

    Recommended next

    More decks on flock safety and related topics.