AI adoption is high, but integration is messy

Creative teams are experimenting with AI tools at scale, but most aren't sticking with them long-term.

By ·

Sep 22, 2026

6 cards · 1m 30s · tap to begin

From · · · 1m 30s

AI adoption is high, but integration is messy

Creative teams are experimenting with AI tools at scale, but most aren't sticking with them long-term.

In brief

Creative teams are experimenting with AI tools at scale, but most aren't sticking with them long-term. High AI adoption among creatives masks a reality of trial-and-error: teams evaluate multiple tools but abandon most of them, suggesting the industry is still figuring out how to actually use AI effectively…

81% of creatives use AI today

A survey of 760 creative professionals found that most are already using AI to create and release content, but adoption rates mask deeper integration challenges.

“81% of creative professionals are using AI to create and release content.”

Teams try many tools, abandon most

Creative organizations evaluated an average of 6.1 AI tools, adopted 4.3, and stopped using three. This churn suggests heavy experimentation without lasting commitment.

“On average, creative organizations evaluated 6.1 tools, adopted 4.3, and stopped using three. This is churn.”

Agencies lead, freelancers lag

Larger agencies are adopting AI faster than independent freelancers, creating a widening gap in how different creative workers access and use these tools.

Video creation lags behind text

Written copy and image generation lead AI adoption among creatives, while video production remains harder and less common because it requires more complex workflows.

“Video is harder to produce.”

Luma shows the hybrid workflow

(L-R) MMC’s Michele Madansky, Luma’s Alexia Adana

Luma's platform lets creatives upload brand guidelines and past campaigns, then use AI agents to generate mood boards and assets without needing technical prompt skills.

“You just need to be somebody with a great idea and really solid direction to give that agent to go execute.”

Human direction still drives results

Even with AI agents handling execution, the creative process remains human-led. Marketers provide direction and ideas while AI handles asset generation and iteration.

“This is all rooted in human authorship, [the assets are] rooted in real photography, and going through a hybrid workflow.”

The essence

High AI adoption among creatives masks a reality of trial-and-error: teams evaluate multiple tools but abandon most of them, suggesting the industry is still figuring out how to actually use AI effectively.

Read the original on Adweek

React

Sign in to react and comment.

Comments (0)

Life is short. Keep it sweet. Respect others' opinions and be kind!

    Recommended next

    More decks on ai adoption and related topics.