America Didn't Lose Its Rare Earth Industry. It Sold It.

U.S. sold rare earth industry to China for economic gain, now faces supply chain risks.

15 cards · 2m · tap to begin

From · · 2m

America Didn't Lose Its Rare Earth Industry. It Sold It.

U.S. sold rare earth industry to China for economic gain, now faces supply chain risks.

In brief

U.S. sold rare earth industry to China for economic gain, now faces supply chain risks. The U.S. voluntarily transferred rare earth production to China in the 1990s, creating long-term dependency on Chinese supply chains. Originally reported by Default.

China's Rare Earth Controls

In October 2025, Beijing imposed sweeping controls on rare earth exports, suspended until Nov. 10 with a broader trade truce through Jan. 10, 2027.

U.S. Companies on Export List

Beijing placed MP Materials and USA Rare Earth, the U.S. companies building alternative supply chains, on an export control list in June 2025.

U.S. Supply Chain Efforts

U.S. Supply Chain Efforts

Washington has $100 billion in loan authority for critical minerals under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act but lacks political alignment to scale supply chain rebuilding.

Historical Context

The U.S. was the world's leading rare earth producer until the 1990s when the Mountain Pass mine shut down due to radioactive waste leaks.

China's Strategic Shift

China now processes 99 percent of heavy rare earths and nearly all materials for precision-guided weapons and advanced chips.

Market Failure

Market Failure

The rare earths market is worth less than $10 billion but can halt global economic activity, making it a strategic chokepoint controlled by China.

U.S. Strategic Mistake

The U.S. sold its rare earth industry to China in the 1990s for economic efficiency, creating long-term dependency on Chinese supply chains.

Beijing's Leverage

Beijing uses rare earth exports as a geopolitical tool, cutting supply during disputes to maintain leverage over the U.S. and its allies.

Government Financing Challenges

Government financing for rare earth supply chains faces misaligned interests between private investors, lenders, and Congress.

CoCo Bond Proposal

A contingent convertible security could align interests by converting into ownership if Beijing weaponizes rare earth supply.

Capacity Trigger

The CoCo bond triggers when a producer meets a capacity threshold, sharing profits with lenders to incentivize build-out.

Beijing's Behavior Trigger

The CoCo bond also triggers if Beijing cuts supply through export controls or bureaucratic delays, converting lenders into equity.

Risk Sharing

The CoCo bond shares the risk of Beijing weaponizing supply with private investors, avoiding nationalization or welfare concerns.

Implementation Challenges

Statutory authority, trigger definitions, and CFIUS integration must be addressed to make the CoCo bond work in practice.

Long-Term Solution

The U.S. needs a financial instrument that can absorb decades of investment while protecting against Beijing's supply cuts.

What it means

The U.S. voluntarily transferred rare earth production to China in the 1990s, creating long-term dependency on Chinese supply chains.

Read the original on Default

React

Sign in to react and comment.

Comments (0)

Life is short. Keep it sweet. Respect others' opinions and be kind!

    Recommended next

    More decks on rare earths and related topics.