Appeals court questions DOJ's challenge to California mail-in ballots

Appeals court doubts DOJ's move to block 20,000 California mail-in ballots from counting.

Oct 26, 2026

16 cards · 3m · tap to begin

From · · 3m

Appeals court questions DOJ's challenge to California mail-in ballots

Appeals court doubts DOJ's move to block 20,000 California mail-in ballots from counting.

In brief

Appeals court doubts DOJ's move to block 20,000 California mail-in ballots from counting. A federal appeals court is questioning the Justice Department's request to exclude 20,000 California mail-in ballots from the count due to suspected noncitizen voting. Originally reported by Straight Arrow.

Appeals court hearing

Appeals court hearing

A federal appeals court could rule as soon as Monday on the Trump administration’s effort to block thousands of mail-in ballots from being counted in California.

Sunday hearing

During a rare Sunday hearing, two of the three judges pressed Justice Department attorneys on their legal arguments, raising doubts about the administration’s request.

20,000 ballots at risk

The Justice Department wants roughly 20,000 mail-in ballots excluded from the count unless officials can verify that they belong to eligible voters.

Administration's claim

A Baltimore hospital worker uploaded 3,182 patients’ records to an unapproved AI tool. Deleting the chat may not have erased them.

The administration claims the ballots were sent to noncitizens.

California's response

California officials dispute that allegation, saying the administration’s list is unverified and includes eligible voters.

Court filings

In court filings, the state has defended its safeguards against noncitizen voting and questioned the reliability of the DOJ’s data.

Judge Bennett's challenge

Judge Bennett's challenge

Circuit Judge Mark Bennett, a Trump appointee, challenged the administration’s authority to seek an order overriding California election law.

Judge Bennett's question

It seems to me that you want us to issue an injunction that is entirely inconsistent with the law that the California Legislature has adopted pursuant to the Elections Clause, how can we do that?

Judge Sanchez's question

Circuit Judge Gabriel Sanchez, appointed by former President Joe Biden, questioned why the appeals court should intervene before a lower court has heard the case.

DOJ timeline

The Justice Department wants a decision before 1 p.m. Pacific time Tuesday, when the lower court is scheduled to take up the dispute.

Administration's reasoning

The administration argues that waiting could allow the contested ballots to be counted before a judge has a chance to act.

Trump's voting

Trump has repeatedly criticized mail-in voting, despite using it himself in Florida.

Trump's recent action

On Saturday, he voted early and in person at an elections office near his Mar-a-Lago resort.

Court timeline

The appeals court said it would issue a ruling as soon as possible.

California's data

California officials say the list includes lawful voters and people with no voting history.

California's sample

Los Angeles found nearly 40% of a 200-person sample indicated U.S. Birth, while 71.2% had no voting history.

The one thing

A federal appeals court is questioning the Justice Department's request to exclude 20,000 California mail-in ballots from the count due to suspected noncitizen voting.

Read the original on Straight Arrow

React

Sign in to react and comment.

Comments (0)

Life is short. Keep it sweet. Respect others' opinions and be kind!

    Recommended next

    More decks on department of justice and related topics.